Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay

SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay

Question Description

I’m working on a science question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

Activity 1

Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study

Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04

Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice.

Suggested Reading

  • Schreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428.
  • Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
  • Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867
  • LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Qualitative Specific Resources

  • LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
    • Chapter1
    • Chapter 2
    • Chapter 3

Additional Instructions:

  • All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
  • Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
  • Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
  • Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
  • Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.

Submission Options:

Choose One:

Instructions:

Paper

  • 4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.

Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation

  • 8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.
  • Follow Rules of 7.

Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation

  • 8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.
  • Follow Rules of 7.

Video Presentation

  • 5 to 8-minute video presentation.
  • Attach reference page or include in video.
  • Professional appearance and background.
  • Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.

Table

  • Table with appropriate columns and headers.
  • Include title and reference pages.

Graphs or other illustrations

  • Graphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.

Poster

  • Poster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.

Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study

page1image2087473520

Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of utilization in practice.

research and its

Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments.

QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IX

page1image2087571904

Area

Gold Mastery

Silver Proficient

Bronze Acceptable

Acceptable Mastery not Demonstrate d

Evaluates

credibility of

research article

the components

of the

appropriate

evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the

problem

statement and

research design

using the

components of

the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).

Evaluates the purpose

Evaluates

credibility of

research article

the components

of the

appropriate

evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the

problem

statement and

research design

using the

components of

the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).

Evaluates the purpose

Evaluates credibility of research article using most of the components (Greater than 3/4) of the

evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the

problem

statement and

research design

using most of the

components of

the evaluation

(greater than 3⁄4)

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purpose

Evaluates

credibility of

research article

using one-half of

the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the

problem

statement and

research design

using one-half of

the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purpose

Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation

Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation

Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation

Does not address section or

page1image2167503920 page1image2167504208 page1image2167504496 page1image2167504784 page1image2167505072 page1image2167505360 page1image2167505648 page1image2167505936 page1image2167506480 page1image2167506672 page1image2167506960 page1image2167507248 page1image2167507536page1image2167507824 page1image2167508112 page1image2167508400 page1image2167508688 page1image2167508976 page1image2167509264 page1image2167509552page1image2167509840 page1image2167510128 page1image2167510416 page1image2167510704 page1image2167511408 page1image2167511600

statement using the components of the evaluation

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

statement using the components of the evaluation

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

statement using 3⁄4 of the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

statement using one-half of the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

includes less than one-half of the evaluation

Evaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the literature review using 3⁄4 of the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the literature review using one-half of the components of the evaluation

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation

Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluation

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluation

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the sampling strategy using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the sampling strategy using one-half of the components of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation

Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).
OR
Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).
OR
Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). .

Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using 3/4 of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using 3/4 of the components

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one-half of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).
OR
Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one-half of the components .

in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one- fourth or less of the evaluation in

LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).
OR
Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one- fourth or less of the components in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).

Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP .

Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP .

Discusses study results in general but not how findings may or may not contribute to EBP .

Discusses EBP in general but does not relate to the research study.

Does not discuss results or how study findings can inform EBP.

APA, Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation

No errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.

One to three errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.

Four to six errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.

Seven or more errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.

References Provides two or Provides two Provides one Provides no more references. references. references. references.

page3image2164547120 page3image2164547408 page3image2164547696 page3image2164547984 page3image2164548272

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Gold Grades only hire the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Gold Grades are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Gold Grades is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Gold Grades, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.