Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

NURS 350 West Coast University Week 2 Shigella Outbreaks and Hygiene Questions

NURS 350 West Coast University Week 2 Shigella Outbreaks and Hygiene Questions

Question Description

I’m working on a nursing writing question and need an explanation to help me study.

For this assignment, you will locate two research studies related to the topic and PICOT questions that you developed in Week 2. (I’ve attached the PICOT paper I submitted below). The articles must be current (within the last five years), and one article must be quantitative, and one article must be qualitative. For this assignment all articles must be related to the field of nursing.

Article choice is very important, therefore:

  • Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments. The selected articles should be original research studies. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review articles should not be used.
  • Mixed-methods studies should not be used.

There are two parts to this assignment.

Part 1: Complete a Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist

  • Select one each: qualitative and quantitative research articles.
  • Create a Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist for the two research articles (one column per article).
  • Complete with brief, concise, summarized information.

Part II: Write a summary (one- to two- pages)

  • Identify differences between quantitative and qualitative designs and research methods.
  • Use current APA Style for your summary paper and to cite your sources.
  • Submit the checklist and summary.

You must submit the research study articles along with your assignment.

Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.

Meets or Exceeds Expectations Mostly Meets Expectations Below Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations
Two substantive research articles
(one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies.

Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)

Two quality, substantive articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are suitable original research studies.

Points Range:7.6 (3.80%) – 8.9 (4.45%)

Two articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are mostly substantive, but at least one is not a suitable original research study, or is not sufficiently substantive.

Points Range:6 (3.00%) – 7.5 (3.75%)

One article is selected and identified as qualitative or quantitative research, or it is not a suitable original research study.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (2.95%)

Articles are not original research; one qualitative and one quantitative article are not identified.

Description of the research problem and purpose of each research article

Points Range:36 (18.00%) – 40 (20.00%)

The research problem and the purpose for each article are expertly examined.

Points Range:30.4 (15.20%) – 35.6 (17.80%)

The research problem and the purpose for each article are adequately examined with minor omissions or errors.

Points Range:24 (12.00%) – 30 (15.00%)

The research problem and the purpose for each article are vague, absent or not identified, and contain major omissions or errors.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 23.6 (11.80%)

The research problem and its purpose are not identified for any of the articles.

Description of the research methods for each research article

Points Range:27 (13.50%) – 30 (15.00%)

An extensive description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is clearly presented for each article.

Points Range:22.8 (11.40%) – 26.7 (13.35%)

An adequate description of the, variables, the sample, and the research methods is presented for most articles with minor omissions or errors.

Points Range:18 (9.00%) – 22.5 (11.25%)

An unsatisfactory description of the variables, sample, and the research methods is presented for both articles with major omissions or errors.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 17.7 (8.85%)

A description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is not presented for any of the articles.

Summary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article

Points Range:36 (18.00%) – 40 (20.00%)

An expertly examined investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is skillfully presented for each article.

Points Range:30.4 (15.20%) – 35.6 (17.80%)

An adequate investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both is satisfactorily presented with minor omissions or errors.

Points Range:24 (12.00%) – 30 (15.00%)

An unsatisfactory investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is provided with major omissions or errors, or only one of the articles is investigated and presented satisfactorily.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 23.6 (11.80%)

A description of the findings, themes, and conclusions, is not presented for either article.

Description of the similarities and differences among the research articles

Points Range:54 (27.00%) – 60 (30.00%)

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough.

Points Range:45.6 (22.80%) – 53.4 (26.70%)

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is adequate with minor omissions or errors.

Points Range:36 (18.00%) – 45 (22.50%)

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is inadequate with major omissions or errors.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 35.4 (17.70%)

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is not provided.

APA

Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)

Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 errors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

Points Range:7.6 (3.80%) – 8.9 (4.45%)

Uses APA Style with minor citation violations with 3–4 errors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

Points Range:6 (3.00%) – 7.5 (3.75%)

Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. Sources are not cited, or there are many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (2.95%)

Does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

Mechanics

Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%)

The writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.

Points Range:7.6 (3.80%) – 8.9 (4.45%)

The writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, includes sufficient details, and is well organized, but it may contain a few errors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with not many errors.

Points Range:6 (3.00%) – 7.5 (3.75%)

The writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous errors, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (2.95%)

The writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Gold Grades only hire the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Gold Grades are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Gold Grades is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Gold Grades, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.