I’m working on a management discussion question and need guidance to help me understand better.

There are two discussion post. i have to reply them based on their answer to the discussion board question. i have to reply my opinion based on their answer to that discussion board question.

undefined

PERSON 1 POST: AMY

undefined

A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability

undefined

Francesco Di Maddaloni and Roya Derakhshan

undefined

This study examines stakeholder management and sustainable development. The authors use major public infrastructure and construction projects (MPIC) as a microcosm to evaluate how to make projects more sustainable. Di Maddaloni and Derakhshan posit that MPIC projects are particularly fraught by stakeholder issues due to their complexity, divergent stakeholder interests and perceived impact on the community. At the same time, MPIC projects have an exponential promise to enact positive change in those same communities.

undefined

According to the authors, stakeholder management theory has historically emphasized primary or vital stakeholders, placing less value or potential impact on secondary stakeholders. There is a trend that is now taking a closer look at secondary actors in a more prominent place in stakeholder identification processes. Thorough stakeholder analysis should build up the picture of the stakeholder environment. Sustainable development fits into this by molding itself to the project management processes. Sustainable development is defined in this paper as transparency and inclusivity with the community. The authors propose that this amalgamation puts project management at the forefront of sustainable development in the organization and broader society. Societal objectives, project process and project goals are aligned.

undefined

Di Maddaloni and Derakhshan use attribution theory to explain how to meld sustainable development into project stakeholder management (2019). The background they provide explains the two stakeholder approaches: management of stakeholders vs. management for stakeholders. The latter approach is inclusive in that it prioritizes respect of and giving legitimacy to stakeholders. This holistic approach tells the project manager to care about and understand the interests of the stakeholders, which aligns with sustainable development. Attribution theory explains that the stakeholders and the project manager are trapped in a negative bond that becomes a cycle. The cycle is fed by automatic perceptions on behalf of both parties. This negative bond can be broken if the project manager utilizes sustainable development methods in stakeholder management.

undefined

The authors suggest two methods to break negative bonds. The first method is increasing transparency with the stakeholders. The second method is increased involvement in the community. Both of these tactics change perceptions of the community stakeholders and the project manager. With the increase in information about the project and understanding of the other perspective, each is forced to utilize a more conscious effort to perceive the other as opposed to mental shortcuts based on scant information. The authors hope to further knowledge in the area of project stakeholder management with this emphasis on relationships and connections. The research and proposed approach are conceptual, and the authors recommend empirical studies to further elucidate this inclusive stakeholder management approach.

undefined

An inclusive and holistic stakeholder management approach contrasts against the conventional categorization of stakeholders by salience or an engagement matrix as illustrated in the PMBOK (Project Management Institute, 2017). However, the trends noted in the PMBOK do point to concepts like co-creation and casting a wider net when identifying stakeholders. While traditional methods are still relevant and effective, the holistic approach addresses issues that repeatedly arise in MCIP projects when the community stakeholders are left out of the loop. This approach can be applied to any project. Specifically, the two methods of transparency and community involvement. The authors use the term sustainable development to describe the holistic approach they suggest. While this term suits this description, I believe it often is misunderstood or misconstrued. Sustainable development can mean many different things and can be applied to multiple disciplines. Being in the agriculture industry, it means something different than how Di Maddaloni and Derakhshan describe it. Nevertheless, I agree that integrating sustainable development into project stakeholder management could improve project success and has the potential to do a better job of understanding and collaborating with stakeholders.

undefined

Di Maddaloni, F., & Derakhshan, R. (2019). A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability. Administrative Sciences (2076-3387), 9(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9020041

undefined

Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

PERSON 2 POST: ROXANNE

The Human Factor in Project Management

undefined

One of the main things I have learned from this course is that you must know how to talk to your people. We often forget and get so blinded by the goal that we can’t remember how to actually get the goal completed without our people. This involves developing backgrounds and connections with your team, stakeholders and specialists that will be working on your project with you. It is so important to acknowledge that these people have hopes, dreams and goals themselves so you can not only understand them better but learn how to motivate them. The case study I chose for this assignment goes over just that and emphasizes how we must not only understand the diversity of our team, but we must also understand ourselves and be aware of how we come off to our team to ensure smooth sailing. The quote they use in the article I chose from Dale Carnegies goes

undefined

“When dealing with people, remember you are not dealing with creatures of logic, but creatures of emotion” (Ciccotti, 2014

undefined

The case study also mentions that you should seek to understand before being understood. This is something that we tend not to do in normal situations since we usually like to talk about ourselves more often because it is easier to speak of ourselves than it is to try and figure out a team member. When certain situations are uncertain, we tend to feed our fears which cause a lot of inaction. This inaction can lead to misunderstanding and negative conflict. When we are able to understand others, we are able to create a connection which is a basic survival need (Ciccotti, 2014). Understanding how people work and what makes them feel worth is how we can create significance in their lives and allow them to feel like they are growing. Ciccotti also mentions that if we can understand people’s primary needs that we can also understand what their commitment and loyalty will be to the goal and vision. The key to becoming a better leader is understanding yourself as a leader better and also understanding the way other people work better. Investing in team morale can greatly benefit any team in learning how to work with each other, developing more camaraderie, and creating a more productive team in the long run.

undefined

When managers can utilize these tools and strategies, they can create a team that can work together based on mutual respect and understanding. The team will feel valued, respected, and like they have significance with the team that they are temporarily working with. Developing this quick rapport and respect is crucial to the success of any project where the team needs to collaborate and be candid with each other on changes. By raising your standard for yourself, you should surely see your team follow.

undefined

References:

undefined

Ciccotti, K. (2014). The human factor in project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.