Hello, below is the prompt it is only5 questions that need to be answered, I need this done by midnight so in about 3 hours. all the way down are the videos that the questions are based upon. PLEASE NO SOPHISTICATED WORDING!!!!
Urgent events require us to deviate from our initial plan in section two, inviting us to reflect on course material and connect it to contemporary examples of political rhetoric. For our second case study, we are examining how presidential address works to negotiate civics, values, knowledge, and identity in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
We will be using sections of former President Trumps press conferences about his administration’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, President Biden and Vice President Harris remarks about the rising tide of anti-AAPI violence in America, and media responses to those speeches as our second case study.
Watch/read the videos/documents posted on Canvas in Announcements/Artifacts for Case Study # 2. Then, answer the questions below. There is no minimum length, just make sure to provide a thorough answer.
- What is the rhetorical context for this controversy? Identify at least two examples relevant rhetorical context.
What are some things happening at the time or in secondary artifact videos that help you determine the rhetorical context? Your examples can be aspects of the context generally, or one of the elements of Bitzers rhetorical situation exigence, constraint, and/or audience.
- How is language being used to shape the audiences view of events? Identify at least one specific example of definition/naming/metaphor in each video.
How is language being used to negotiate values, establish a view of the situation, and/or recommend a course of action? To what extent are definitions/names used to assign praise or blame, to unify or divide, to generate urgency or give pause? How are words used to construct and/or enforce norms about appropriate civic practice? You may use examples from the Viala-Gaudefroy and Lindaman reading but you should include your own original examples from the videos as well.
- Which rhetorical model best explains the relationship between President Trumps rhetoric and the uptick of anti-AAPI violence in America during the pandemic?
Which theory of presidential rhetoric is most applicable to case study? The traditional model of presidential definition advanced by Zarefsky? Or the postmodern model of the presidency as pastiche developed by Heidt? Your answer should attend to the relative importance of the speaker/audience in constructing/negotiating the meaning of presidential public address. You should also provide specific examples from the videos to support any claims about the effects of presidential definitions or the “atomization”/”circulation” of presidential address.
- How do racialized/gendered norms implicate the Biden Administrations response to hate crimes targeting members of the AAPI community?
To what extend did the order/content of the speeches delivered by the President and Vice President transgress gendered norms associated with the office? In what ways did the media response to these speeches illustrate the racialized construction of the presidency?
- Evaluate the quality:
Choose either the Trump Administration or the Biden Administration, and based on your answers to questions 1-4, make an initial evaluation of the quality of the rhetoric. Was this an effective response to the rhetorical context? Why or why not?
How to Get the Most Out of This Assignment:
- Be specific: Remember, the point of the assignment isnt just to watch the videos. Rather, you should look for what specific, unique observations you can make using course readings. What might Bitzer, Stuckey, Heidt, Zaresfsky, Viala-Gaudefroy and Lindaman say about these texts? Provide specific examples from the case study articles and videos, and from the readings.
2. Be engaged in class: Be prepared to discuss the prompts in class on Tuesday March 30th. Upload your answers to the case study to Canvas by 11:55 pm on April 1st.
- Consider grading criteria: You will be evaluated on whether you answer each question completely, the specificity of your examples from the videos, the specificity of your reference to course materials, and the correctness of your application to course material. You will receive 20 points for responding to each question.
- President Trump answers questions about the wave of attacks on AAPI and its relationship to the use of terms such as Chinese Virus and “kung flu” to describe Covid-19: (Links to an external site.)
- President Biden and Vice President Harris speak out about the rise of attacks on AAPI: https://www.c-span.org/video/?510082-1/president-biden-addresses-deadly-shootings-covid-19-response-speech-atlanta (Links to an external site.)
- Author Ying Ma visits Fox News to discuss President Biden’s and Vice President Harris’ remarks about AAPI hate-crimes: https://twitter.com/bad_takes/status/1373097638686… (Links to an external site.)
- On the Rise of Hate Crimes Targeting Asian Americans: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/asian-american-community-battles-surge-in-hate-crimes-stirred-from-covid-19 (Links to an external site.)